gallery or street?
This article, by a British writer is tired of Bansky, I can't help but wonder; the irony of his work being sold in galleries?
[...stumbling across his work in alleys and splashed on buildings throughout London. And occasionally the artist has created work both bracingly timely and incisive (”NOLA", is a particularly good example). But it is impossible to contain the raw energy of street art in a formal art space, where any anti-establishment strains in his work are bled away beneath the expensive track lighting.]
Isn't selling this kind of art in a gallery the height of cultural hypocrisy anyway?






Leave a comment